The Role of the Health Belief Model in Antenatal Care Visits among Pregnant Women at Sentru Saude Komunitaria, Baucau Municipality, Timor Leste
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26911/Abstract
Background: Antenatal Care (ANC) visits are an essential intervention for reducing the risk of maternal morbidity and mortality. However, ANC coverage in several regions of Timor-Leste, including Baucau Municipality, remains below the national target. This study aimed to analyze factors influencing pregnant women’s compliance with recommended ANC visits according to timing and guidelines using the Health Belief Model (HBM)
Subjects and Method: This cross-sectional study involved 200 pregnant women registered at healthcare facilities in Baucau Municipality, Timor-Leste. Data were collected using a question-naire based on HBM constructs that had been tested for validity and reliability. Data were analyzed using path analysis with STATA version 13 to identify direct and indirect effects among variables associated with ANC visits.
Results: The results showed that cues to action had a direct and positive effect on ANC visits (b= 0.12; 95% CI= 0.03 to 0.20; p= 0.005). Gestational age had a significant positive effect on ANC visits (b= 0.24; 95% CI= 0.16 to 0.32; p< 0.001). In contrast, distance to healthcare facilities had a significant negative effect (b= -0.70; 95% CI= -0.75 to -0.64; p< 0.001), while parity had a negative but non-significant effect (b= -0.05; 95% CI= -0.14 to 0.03; p= 0.175). Self-efficacy had an indirect effect on ANC visits through perceived benefits (b= 0.15; 95% CI= 0.01 to 0.29; p= 0.040) and perceived benefits also had a significant indirect effect (b= 0.22; 95% CI= 0.08 to 0.37; p= 0.002). Perceived severity indirectly influenced ANC visits as well (b= -0.14; 95% CI= -0.26 to -0.01; p= 0.035).
Conclusion: ANC visits increased with stronger cues to action and advancing gestational age. Conversely, ANC visits decreased with greater parity and longer distance to healthcare facilities. ANC visits were indirectly influenced by perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived barriers, perceived benefits, and self-efficacy.
Keywords:
antenatal care, health belief model, pregnant womenHow to Cite
References
Al-Mamun M, Kalam A, Uzzal NI (2025). Factors affecting maternal health and antenatal care services of working mothers in Southwestern Coastal Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study. Ann Med Surg. 87(2): 487-496. https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000002895.
Basic Health Research (2018). Indonesian Basic Health Research Report Year 2018.
Bayrami R, Masudi S, Didarloo A, Nournezhad H (2024). Determining the predictors of preventive behaviors adopted by pregnant women against COVID-19 based on the Health Belief Model constructs: a cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 24:528. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03305-7.
Dafroyati Y, Widyastuty R, Kristina RH (2024). Health belief model analysis on the maternal through antenatal care as an effort to prevent mortality. Gac Med Caracas. 132(3): 656-664. https://doi.org/10.47307/GMC.2024.132.3.8.
Grand-Guillaume-Perrenoud JA, Origlia P, Cignacco E (2022). Barriers and faci-litators of maternal healthcare utilisa-tion in the perinatal period among women with social disa¬dvantage: A theory-guided systematic review. Midwifery. 105: 103237. https://doi.-org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.103237.
Haning FLA, Lada CO, Junias MS, Manafe YJ, Gero S (2022). Health Belief Model dan kepatuhan ibu. J Telenurs. 4(2): 804-819. https://doi.org/10.3-1539/joting.v4i2.3898.
Irawati D, Madinah A, Wayanti S (2024). Health Belief Model theory approach to analyze pregnant women's ability to prevent anemia. J Kesehat Reprod. 15(1): 31-38. https://doi.org/10.266-30/jk.v15i1.4216.
Jiwani SS, Amouzou-Aguirre A, Carvajal L, Chou D, Keita Y, Moran AC, et al. (2020). Timing and number of ante-natal care contacts in low- and middle-income countries: analysis in the Countdown to 2030 priority countries. J Glob Health. 10(1): 010502. https://doi.org/10.71¬89/jog-h.10 .010502.
Kahsay ZH, Hiluf MK, Shamie R, Tadesse Y, Bazzano AN (2019). Pregnant women’s intentions to deliver at a health facility in the pastoralist communities of Afar, Ethiopia: an application of the health belief model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(5): 5088. https://doi.org/10.3390-/ijerph16050888.
Kase BF, Seifu BL, Mare KU, Shibeshi AH, Asebe HA, Gemeda K, et al. (2025). Time to first antenatal care visit and its predictors among women in Kenya: Weibull gamma shared frailty model (based on the 2022 KDHS data). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 25(1):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s1-2884-025-07178-y.
Kim SH, Jung SY, Kim Y, Lee YJ (2024). Development and psychometric pro-perties of the Health Belief Model scale for premature birth prevention (HBM-PBP) for women of child¬bear-ing age. Int J Womens Health. 16: 1173-1186. https://doi.org/10.2147/ IJWH.S456201.
Krishna BK, Rahman M, Rahman T, Rahman T, Khalil JJ, Hasan M, et al. (2020). Status of the WHO-recommended timing and frequency of antenatal care visits in Northern Bangladesh. PLoS One. 32(40): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241185.
Lee S, Adam E, Kanyike AM, Wani S, Kasibante S, Mukunya D, et al. (2024). Compliance with the WHO recommended 8+ antenatal care contacts schedule among postpartum mothers in Eastern Uganda: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. (196): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314769.
Nelson JR, Gren LH, Dickerson TT, Benson LS, Manortey SO, Ametepey E, et al. (2021). Using the health belief model to explore rural maternal utilisation of skilled health personnel for childbirth delivery: a qualitative study in three districts of the eastern region of Ghana. J Glob Health Rep. 5: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.29883.
Penman SV, Beatson RM, Walker EH, Goldfeld S, Molloy CS (2023). Barriers to accessing and receiving antenatal care: findings from inter-views with Australian women expe-riencing disadvantage. J Adv Nurs. 79(12): 4672-4686. https://doi.org/-10.1111/jan.15724.
Pormehr-Yabandeh A, Aghamolaei T, Hosseini Z, Roozbeh N, Ghanbarnez-had A (2025). Application of the health belief model to explain pre-conception care among women with sickle cell disease: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 25(1):922. https://doi.org/10.1186/s1¬2884-025-08070-5.
Rosenstock IM (1974). Historical origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Monogr. 2(4): 328-335. https://doi.-org/10.1177/109019817400200403.
TLDHS. (2016). Timor-Leste Demographic and Health Survey 2016. [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.dhspro-gram.com/.
Tunçalp Ö, Pena-Rosas JP, Lawrie T, Bucagu M, Oladapo OT, Portela A, Gülmezoglu AM (2017). WHO recom-mendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience—going beyond survival. BJOG. 124(6): 860-862. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-05-28.14599.
Tungaraza MB, Joho AA. (2022). The Health Belief Model and self-determination theory in explaining the use of antenatal care services: a cross-sectional study. Afr J Midwifery Womens Health. 16(2): 1-11. doi: 10.12968/ajmw.2021.0012.
Warri D, George A. (2020). Perceptions of pregnant women of reasons for late initiation of antenatal care: a quali-tative interview study. BMC Preg-nancy Childbirth. 20(1):70. https://-doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2746-0.
WHO. (2023). Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2020: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and UNDESA/Population Division. WHO: Geneva.
